How are usability, quality or risk checked during Quality Assurance & Acceptance Testing work?

How are usability, quality or risk checked during Quality Assurance… |…

Annex uses evidence during delivery rather than treating quality as a final inspection step. We took a risk based approach to testing to ensure good coverage of the highest priority features within the timeframe. The ART website testing was a short, tidy piece of work which highlights the testing expertise we have at Annex. Depending on the engagement, evidence can come from research, prototype validation, functional or accessibility testing, analytics and stakeholder feedback. The success measures should follow the real user and service goals; Annex does not publish one universal metric for every quality assurance & acceptance testing project.

ActewAGL — Online Plan Selection — Laptop screen displaying a welcome page for choosing a utility plan

Useful next steps

Use this answer as a practical starting point. Current scope, specifications, compatibility, availability, pricing, timing and next steps should be confirmed directly with Annex where they affect a decision.

Open topic Contact Annex All Q&A

Continue The Conversation

Natural Follow-Up Questions

These questions continue the same line of enquiry rather than starting a completely unrelated topic.

Previous questionHow would Annex explain Quality Assurance & Acceptance Testing to a project stakeholder who is not a specialist?

Annex treats Quality Assurance & Acceptance Testing as part of a wider digital-service problem, not as an isolated output. Risk-based functional, exploratory and accessibility testing for complex digital services. These examples show experience with public-facing services, complex workflows, accessi…

Yes, that can be possible; Annex's published work includes delivery inside existing technical and organisational environments rather than only greenfield builds. We took a risk based approach to testing to ensure good coverage of the highest priority features within the timeframe. Annex worked with …

Annex's published work does not point to a single mandatory toolset for quality assurance & acceptance testing. The Administrative Review Tribunal (ART) required independent acceptance testing of the newly built Administrative Review Tribunal (ART) website. We took a risk based approach to testing t…

A useful published example is **Quick quality assurance**. Annex worked with the Administrative Review Tribunal (ART) to provide independent testing of the newly built Administrative Review Tribunal (ART) website. The Administrative Review Tribunal (ART) required independent acceptance testing of th…

The easy mistake is to scope quality assurance & acceptance testing too narrowly. We took a risk based approach to testing to ensure good coverage of the highest priority features within the timeframe. These examples show experience with public-facing services, complex workflows, accessibility, gove…